Tsygan Formality and Duflo Formula

نویسنده

  • BORIS SHOIKHET
چکیده

We prove the 0-(co)homology part of the conjecture on the cup-products on tangent cohomology in the Tsygan formality [Sh2]. We discuss its applications to the Duflo formula. A short introduction The Tsygan formality conjecture for chains [Ts] was proven in the author’s work [Sh2] by an explicit construction of suitable Kontsevich-type integrals. This paper is a further development of ideas of [Sh2]. We will freely use the notations and results of [Sh2]. In [Sh2] we formulated a conjecture on “the cup-products on tangent cohomology”, which is a version of the analogous Kontsevich theorem from Section 8 of [K]. Here we prove this conjecture for 0-(co)homology. 1. The classical Duflo formula and the generalized Duflo formula 1.1. Let g be a finite-dimensional Lie algebra, S(g) and U(g) be its symmetric and universal enveloping algebra. They are not isomorphic as algebras S(g) is a commutative algebra and U(g) is a non-commutative algebra. We can consider both spaces S(g) and U(g) as g-modules with the adjoint action for S(g) and the action g ·ω = g⊗ω− ω⊗ g for U(g) (here g ∈ g and ω ∈ U(g)). It is clear that these g-modules are isomorphic, the isomorphism is the classical Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt map: φPBW (g1 · · · · · gk) = 1 k! ∑ σ∈Σk gσ(1) ⊗ · · · ⊗ gσ(k) (1) (g1, . . . , gk ∈ g). The Duflo theorem [D] states that the invariants [S(g)] and [U(g)] are isomorphic as algebras. The Duflo formula is a canonical formula for this isomorphism. We recall it here. For any k ≥ 1, there exists a canonical element in [S(g)]. It is the symmetrization of the map g 7→ Tr|g ad k g (g ∈ g). We denote this element in [S(g)] by Trk. (It was a conjecture of M. Duflo that these elements are zero for odd k and any finite-dimensional Lie algebra g; this conjecture was proven recently in [AB]). We can consider an element from S(g) as a differential operator of the k-th order with constant coefficients, acting on S(g). (Thus, an element from g is a derivation of S(g)).

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Proof of the Tsygan Formality Conjecture for Chains

We extend the Kontsevich formality L∞-morphism U : T • poly(R ) → D poly(R ) to an L∞-morphism of an L∞-modules over T • poly(R ), Û : C•(A, A) → Ω(R), A = C(R). The construction of the map Û is given in Kontsevich-type integrals. The conjecture that such an L∞-morphism exists is due to Boris Tsygan [Ts]. As an application, we obtain an explicit formula for isomorphism A∗/[A∗, A∗] ∼ → A/{A, A} ...

متن کامل

On the cyclic Formality conjecture

We conjecture an explicit formula for a cyclic analog of the Formality L∞-morphism [K]. We prove that its first Taylor component, the cyclic Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg map, is in fact a morphism (and a quasiisomorphism) of the complexes. To prove it we construct a cohomological version of the Connes-Tsygan bicomplex in cyclic homology. As an application of the cyclic Formality conjecture, we ...

متن کامل

Deformation quantization with traces and vanishing of the wheels

We prove that the Kontsevich integrals (in the sense of the formality theorem [K]) of all even wheels are equal to zero. These integrals appear in the approach to the Duflo formula via the formality theorem. The result means that for any finite-dimensional Lie algebra g, and for invariant polynomials f, g ∈ [S·(g)]g one has f ·g = f ∗g, where ∗ is the Kontsevich star-product, corresponding to t...

متن کامل

L∞-morphisms of Cyclic Chains

Recently the first two authors [1] constructed an L∞-morphism using the S1-equivariant version of the Poisson Sigma Model (PSM). Its role in deformation quantization was not entirely clear. We give here a “good” interpretation and show that the resulting formality statement is equivalent to formality on cyclic chains as conjectured by Tsygan and proved recently by several authors [5], [9].

متن کامل

Vanishing of the Kontsevich integrals of the wheels

We prove that the Kontsevich integrals (in the sense of the formality theorem [K]) of all even wheels are equal to zero. These integrals appear in the approach to the Duflo formula via the formality theorem. The result means that for any finite-dimensional Lie algebra g, and for invariant polynomials f, g ∈ [S·(g)]g one has f · g = f ∗ g, where ∗ is the Kontsevich star-product, corresponding to...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009